In a large storage facility located in eastern Thailand, close to a significant highway, government inspector Thitipas Choddaechachainun carefully scrutinizes heaps of disposed electronics—circuit boards, metal scraps, and obsolete computer parts. Every week, she and her team from the Thai Ministry of Industry explore unauthorized sites managing electronic waste, gathering samples for lab analysis and regulatory compliance.
Choddaechachainun heads a committed team focused on tackling the nation’s escalating issue with electronic waste, also known as e-waste. Even with regular checks and operations on these unauthorized facilities—many of which are concealed in remote areas to evade attention—the magnitude of the issue keeps growing.
Thailand is dealing with the consequences of shifts in global electronic waste allocation. Previously, countries like China handled the majority of digital discards from wealthier nations, particularly the United States and European Union members. This changed in 2018 when China implemented a ban on e-waste imports, prompting exporters to seek alternative locations in Southeast Asia, with Thailand being among the selected ones.
Thailand implemented its own ban on importing e-waste in 2020. Nonetheless, the results have not been favorable. According to Earth Thailand, a nonprofit focused on environmental protection, the amount of e-waste entering the nation has increased from approximately 3,000 tons annually before China’s restriction to almost 60,000 tons now.
This influx is partly fueled by high turnover rates in electronic devices among Western consumers. Frequent upgrades to smartphones, laptops, and other electronic goods—combined with widespread ownership of large household appliances—generate substantial waste. Although international regulations aim to prevent the export of hazardous waste to developing nations, loopholes remain. For example, shipments are often misdeclared as used electronics meant for resale, only to be dismantled and smelted upon arrival.
The recycling process itself poses significant environmental risks. Once on Thai soil, the e-waste is crushed and smelted to extract valuable raw materials like copper and gold. While profitable, this method of recovery emits dangerous substances such as mercury and lead, and contaminates the air, soil, and water.
Thai authorities are of the opinion that most of the gathered metals are sent to China, resulting in environmental and social impacts.
Thai Industry Minister Akanat Promphan is vocal about the harm these operations cause. He emphasizes that the illegal recycling industry contributes nothing to the national economy and instead damages local ecosystems and communities. His ministry has launched a more aggressive campaign to shut down unauthorized operations and expel foreign-owned plants involved in illegal processing.
Thailand is regarded as a dumping ground, Promphan observes. “We are dealing with an international waste management practice that provides no benefit to our country and leads to considerable damage.”
The harmful effects reach ordinary people such as Seng Wongsena, a 57-year-old agricultural worker in eastern Thailand. He asserts that contaminated runoff from a nearby smelting plant has negatively impacted his cassava crop, and the odor of burning waste disturbs his rest at night. Community activists argue that the smelting operation lacks proper authorization and are urging government officials to take action.
On a global scale, the implications are sobering. Data from the United Nations indicates that more than 60 million tonnes of e-waste are generated globally each year—double the volume recorded 15 years ago. Forecasts suggest that this figure could rise by over 30% by the end of the decade.
Despite the concerning rise, merely around 20% of worldwide electronic waste is processed through responsible and eco-friendly methods. The remainder is discarded in landfills or handled under hazardous conditions, frequently in nations with inadequate regulatory control.
Several countries have implemented laws concerning extended producer responsibility, which make producers responsible for the disposal of their products at the end of their life cycles. Firms like Apple, Samsung, and Dell are being encouraged to create mechanisms for taking back and recycling their products.
Thailand is considering a similar legislative framework, aiming to strengthen local enforcement and reduce illegal activities related to e-waste handling. Promphan is optimistic about its future implementation.
“I’m hopeful that we will pass this new law soon—either by the end of this year or early next year,” he says. “We need comprehensive action to eliminate this illicit industry and protect our people and environment.”
As Thailand advances with legislative changes and strengthens oversight, these efforts symbolize a minor part of a broader global challenge. Handling electronic waste requires international cooperation, well-defined supply chains, and collaboration between users and manufacturers. Without significant change, the environmental repercussions of our technology-driven era could outweigh its benefits.
